The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership
The Middle East and the
Mediterranean Region
in the Italian EU Presidency
Roberto Aliboni
Vice President and Head
of the Mediterranean and Middle
East Programme
International Affairs Institute
(IAI), Rome
PDF version 
Italy presented its July-December 2003
EU Presidency programme at the
Council held on 21st July 2003. The
programme is elaborated in a document
entitled «Europe: Citizens of a
Shared Dream», in which the Mediterranean
and the Middle East feature as
prominent parts. Three issues are regarded
as priorities, and which the EU
Italian Presidency intends to pursue: (a)
post-war Iraq; (b) the Road Map process
in the Middle East; and (c) the development
of the Euro-Mediterranean
Partnership in the Mediterranean area.
It is true that Iraq is regarded by the Italian
programme as less of a regional issue
and more of a European and transatlantic
matter. What is brought to the
forefront of Italy’s actions, in its capacity
as the President of the EU, is the target
of reconciliation in Europe, both among
its own countries and with the United
States. The programme stresses the
transatlantic perspective with which
Italy will pursue EU reconciliation: «The
Iraqi crisis has, of course, had the effect
of weakening the transatlantic link; we
therefore need to put that critical phase
behind us and re-establish the traditional
special relationship with Washington
». In this sense, the question tackled
by the Italian Presidency with respect
to the Middle East and the Mediterranean
is more related to the Road Map
and Euro-Mediterranean issues, and
has less to do with Iraq itself.
As far as the Middle East peace process
is concerned, the programme
highlights that «the formation of a representative
Palestinian government,
the publication of the Road Map and the
renewed involvement of the United
States, Europe and Russia in re-launching
the peace process all entail increased
responsibilities for the Italian
Presidency, but they also point to considerable
opportunities». In fact, the
Italian government is devoting special
and assiduous consideration to Israeli-
Palestinian relations in the framework
of the Road Map process.
In general, Italy is sceptical about the
possibility of organising the conference
that would permit the advance
from the first to the second stage of
the Road Map. However, the country
is undertaking the organisation of the
donor’s conference. The approval of
the denominated Marshall Plan for
Palestine by the G7 in Dubai is a step
towards achieving a plan that Italy has
always supported and fostered.
When it comes to the attempts at resolving
the conflict, the main guidelines for
its diplomatic action are clearly stated
in the Declaration on the situation in the
Middle East released by the Presidency
on 11th September 2003, in Brussels.
In this Declaration, the Presidency
points out the short term goals that the
two parties are expected to pursue in
order to create the proper conditions
for the Road Map to be achieved:
The European Union urges the two
parties to remain strongly committed
to the need for continued dialogue and
the implementation of the Road Map,
and regarding this purpose to take the
following measures:
• On the part of the PNA: the formation
of a new government; re-organisation
of its security forces; re-establishment
of public order and the
instigation of visible efforts to dismantle
the terrorist organisations;
implementation of the already initiated
reforms and organisation of free
and transparent elections.
• With respect to the Israeli government:
the withdrawal of their army
from the autonomous areas; the
eradication of target killings; the removal
the road blocks and other
restrictions imposed on the Palestinian
people; the freezing of all settlement
activities and on the building
of the security wall along a route
that jeopardises a political solution
to the conflict.
A exemplifying point of the Presidency’s
policy is to assure a balance between
European relations with Israel
and Palestine. In the Italian government
opinion is very firmly held regarding
the issue that the Israeli misperception
of a European imbalance in
favour of the Palestinians has to be
corrected. The situation calls for a
confidence-building campaign with
respect to Israel and the Israeli people,
as well as conduct that is constantly
geared at acquiring and maintaining
credibility on both sides
However, in its day-to-day diplomacy,
Italy insists along with the Palestinians
on the absolute need to contain and
suppress terrorism in order to be able
to establish proper conditions of security
for Israel; and in their talks with the
Israelis the necessity of the new Palestinian
leadership for more-convinced
supporters has not been overlooked;
the incompatibility of target killings with
any cease-fire; and the fact that the
construction of the security fence will seriously compromise any chance of
agreement. All these measures weaken
the new Palestinian leaders to which
the Western countries are offering their
support with a view to replace the old
leadership’s ambiguities.
In particular, Italy has condemned the
idea of the expulsion, and assassination,
of President Arafat. While the new
leaders have to be supported, Arafat
has to be respected as he expresses a
wide Palestinian consensus.
With regard to the international community,
Italy believes that monitoring activities,
currently in the planning stages
in the Quartet, have to be initiated
straight away in their current first stage
with the purpose of reassuring Palestinian
people in regard to the Israeli reoccupation
of territories. According to
the Italians, Europe can already provide
a contribution to monitoring, by taking
advantage of its previous experiences
in civilian monitoring (the force deployed
in Hebron) and the new assets within
the framework of the European
Security and Defence Policy-ESDP.
Europe should take a leaf out the United
States’ book, presently conducting
monitoring activities independently.
However, their activities focus on security
against terrorism, while neglecting
broader issues of popular security.
With respect to the second Italian priority,
the Euro-Med Partnership, the role
of the ESDP is also a central one. According
to the programme: «The Italian
Presidency intends to pay special attention
to the dialogue with the countries of the Southern Mediterranean ...
with which it is important to establish
the ESDP as a factor of regional stability,
and therefore of mutual benefit.» In
this respect, Italy is pursuing the objectives
envisaged in the 23rd April 2002
Valencia Action Plan by stating that:
«The political dialogue … must focus
among other things on … effective dialogue
on political and security matters,
including on the ESDP …». The successive
Presidencies have pursued
that task by organising special seminars
with a military participation (Barcelona,
May 2002; Rhodes, November
2002 and Corfu, May 2003). With the
same perspective, during the Italian
semester the EU-ISS organised on a
seminar in Brussels on «ESDP and the
Mediterranean» on 18th September
2003 at the request of the Political and
Security Committee. The Italian Military
Centre for Strategic Studies organised
a similar seminar in Rome on 25th September
2003 on «Security, Stability
and Cooperation in the Mediterranean
region». Both seminars have discussed
the potential of the ESDP in the Euro-Med framework.
Beside the ESDP developments and
their relevance for the EMP, the Italian
government has set out a highly detailed
account of its priorities in the
document on common strategy that
every Presidency has to prepare in
accordance with general regulations
established by the Common Strategy
of the European Union for the Mediterranean
Region adopted by the Santa
Maria de Feira European Council in
June 2002. This document states three
main priorities:
• To complete the project of a Euro-
Mediterranean Foundation for the
Dialogue between Cultures and
Civilisations, thereby facilitating its
establishment;
• To promote the evaluation of the
functioning of the FEMIP, with a
view to incorporating the FEMIP in
an EIB majority-owned subsidiary
dedicated to the Mediterranean
partners;
• To include a Euro-Med Parliamentary
Assembly with consultative
powers in the Euro-Med framework,
by relaxing the necessary accord
on such an assembly of the European
Parliament and Euro-Med national
assemblies.
The Commission, in a communication
of mid-October 2003 aimed at setting
the agenda of the Ministerial conference
of 2nd to 3rd December 2003 in
Naples, recommended these three objectives
explicitly.
The Foundation for Dialogue between
Cultures and Civilisations is expected
to ease contacts, particularly at the level
of civil society, and to help policies on
migration, the struggle against racism
and xenophobia, as well as a general
mutual understanding.
As for the existing FEMIP (Facility for
Euro-Mediterranean Investment and
Partnership), established according
to the decision made by the Barcelona
European Council of March 2002,
as an EIB counter, it will be incorporated
into an EIB subsidiary with the
aim of fostering private investment in
the Southern Mediterranean Partners.
At many venues in the past, the Italian
government has supported the idea of
setting up a Mediterranean Development
Bank. The EIB subsidiary will
not be a bank of its own. However, it
will be an independent body dealing
with the substantive challenge of encouraging
European private saving for
investment in the South Mediterranean
area, and hopefully act as a decisive
factor for its development in the Euro-
Med framework.
To quote its own words, the Italian
Presidency programme hoped «to turn
to good account» all these initiatives
presented at the Euro-Mediterranean
Ministerial Conference in Naples at
the beginning of December.
|